Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta vs Arjun Mahadevan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L W L W L
Form
L W W L L L L W L LHead To Head: Ganta 2 - 1 Mahadevan
They have played 7 sets in total, with Ganta winning 5 and Mahadevan winning 2. The last match between Ganta and Mahadevan was at the M25 Kigali, 13-09-2023, First, Clay with Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta | 2 |
| Arjun Mahadevan | 1 |
M25 Kigali(13-09-2023)
| Ganta | Stats | Mahadevan |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (5-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 24 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 47% (69-77) | Career Total W/L | 30% (38-87) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
Player
Arjun Mahadevan
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
83%
(
44 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 5-7 7-5 10-6 |
Stats
Arjun Mahadevan
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
9
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 43 | Games Won | 37 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:2:40 | Average Match Time | 1:2:40 |
| 60% (81/135) | 1st Serve % | 75% (90/120) |
| 74% (60/81) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (62/90) |
| 48% (26/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 37% (44/120) | Return Points Win % | 36% (49/135) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-7(1) 10-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Kabir Hans
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Vullnet Tashi
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
77%
(
63 of
82)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 5-7 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Filiberto Fumagalli
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
36 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
15 of
62)
57
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kousuke Ogura
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
68%
(
77 of
113)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
95)
0
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
5
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
50 of
70)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
40 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
Player
Grigoriy Lomakin
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
72
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
view more
Arjun Mahadevan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Arjun Mahadevan
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arjun Mahadevan
Player
Yash Chaurasia
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
Arjun Mahadevan
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47% (69/77) | Win/Loss | 30% (38/87) |
| 49% (162/169) | Sets Win/Loss | 34% (94/179) |
| 50% (1655/1669) | Games Win/Loss | 43% (1075/1399) |
| 47% (49/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 32% (30/64) |
| 50% (20/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 26% (8/23) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 267 | Aces Total | 23 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 202 | Total Double Faults | 166 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 198.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 146.09 |
| 67% (3382/5015) | 1st Serve % | 71% (1989/2796) |
| 67% (2269/3382) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (1163/1989) |
| 48% (782/1633) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (330/807) |
| 43% (180/421) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (110/263) |
| 37% (1855/4947) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1094/2806) |
| 0% (0/5) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (69/72) | Futures W/L | 30% (38/87) |
| 48% (69/145) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 30% (38/125) |
| 47% (18/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (4/12) |
| 40% (16/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 22% (5/23) |
| 79% (80/63) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (42/33) |
| 20% (80/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (42/9) |
| 9% (66/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (83/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
